American attitudes on interracial dating online shemale dating sim

The truth is simply this, every group is going to act in such a way as to maximize their own benefits, and lately WASPs have been losing that game, not winning it.As David Horowitz has so elegantly pointed out in his attack on reparations for Blacks, there has already been a transfer of 5 billion dollars to Blacks since 1965. But in simpler terms, Feagin just hates WASPs, especially males; with his hatred for Whites diminishing as the vile nature of Whites in general gets farther away from the center core, like concentric circles. It has more to do with an ongoing power struggle between the old Marxists and the general White population that is, contrary to Feagin's thesis, quite apolitical and unwilling to yield to a new totalitarian egalitarian state (Communism).That is, much of what WASPs earn, own, or control comes from past oppression. He goes on to claim that there is a conspiracy amongst these WASPs still going on today to oppress and exploit Blacks.He calls this systemic racism, and he tells some pretty tall tales about how it takes place.Throughout this book, it is apparent that Feagin is trying as hard as he can to be divisive without really being very clear about the groups who are to be reviled.He includes in his "people of color" category: Asians, Asian Indians, North African Caucasians, Amerindians, Semites, and even Latinos.

american attitudes on interracial dating-73

Throughout the book, it is always "White men" who are the oppressors, as if the White women were some other species or race.

These people want to be in control, and the only way they can do this is by exerting moral blackmail on everybody else." (Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky)"Unlike most behaviorists, Hans Eysenck accepted both the 'reality' of intelligence differences and their mainly biological origins; and he had already upset social scientists in Britain by claiming that Nationalists and Communists might have underlying psychological traits of illiberalism, insensitivity and spitefulness genetically in common." (Brand, 1996)In reading this book, in order to understand its real content, I had to look beyond what was being stated.

I had to "deconstruct" the motive or purpose of this hateful diatribe against Whites, and especially White males.

Today, those who once attacked sociobiology no longer have any scientific standing; the debate is over (see Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond, 2000 ).

In addition, it is commonly accepted that intelligence is 60 to 80% heritable and it has been so stated by a task force put together by the American Psychological Association in response to the publication of The Bell Curve in 1994.

Leave a Reply